Assignment 1: Analysis of a Philosopher’s Views Due Week 4 and worth 150 points Preparation: Read “Egoism and Moral Skepticism”s s by James Rachels, located in Chapter 3: Morality and Self Interest. Discuss his views and provide a valid and logical analysis and response. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Analyze James Rachel’s arguments regarding psychological egoism and ethical egoism. Provide at least two (2) examples that support the idea of moral skepticism. Discuss whether or not morality is possible in light of egoism, providing a rationale and examples to support your position. Include at least three (3) credible, academic references. (Do not use such open sources as Wikipedia, About, Ask.) Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Explain the views of the main philosophers and the primary ethical concepts associated with each of the major ethical theories presented in the course. Recognize basic ethical theories, such as Divine Command Theory, Relativism, Utilitarianism, Kantianism, Social Contract Theory, Egoism, and Virtue Ethics. Demonstrate an understanding of how to examine questions and issues from diverse ethical perspectives and how these different ethical perspectives can be applied to evaluate contemporary ethical dilemmas. Demonstrate recognition of the role and function of moral arguments addressing traditional and contemporary moral issues. Present complex ethical ideas, theories, and perspectives fairly, objectively, and critically. Use technology and information resources to research issues in ethics. Write clearly and concisely about ethics using proper writing mechanics.
phi_220_assignment_1_requirements.docx

phi_220_assignment_1_requirements.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment 1: Analysis of a Philosopher’s Views
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
Preparation:
Read “Egoism and Moral Skepticism”s s by James Rachels, located in Chapter 3:
Morality and Self Interest. Discuss his views and provide a valid and logical analysis
and response.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
1. Analyze James Rachel’s arguments regarding
psychological egoism and ethical egoism.
2. Provide at least two (2) examples that support the idea of
moral skepticism.
3. Discuss whether or not morality is possible in light of
egoism, providing a rationale and examples to support
your position.
4. Include at least three (3) credible, academic references.
(Do not use such open sources as Wikipedia, About, Ask.)
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font
(size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and
references must follow APA. Check with your professor for
any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment,
the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title,
and the date. The cover page and the reference page are
not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
• Explain the views of the main philosophers and the primary
ethical concepts associated with each of the major ethical
theories presented in the course.
• Recognize basic ethical theories, such as Divine
Command Theory, Relativism, Utilitarianism, Kantianism,
Social Contract Theory, Egoism, and Virtue Ethics.
• Demonstrate an understanding of how to examine
questions and issues from diverse ethical perspectives and
how these different ethical perspectives can be applied to
evaluate contemporary ethical dilemmas.
• Demonstrate recognition of the role and function of moral
arguments addressing traditional and contemporary moral
issues.



Present complex ethical ideas, theories, and perspectives
fairly, objectively, and critically.
Use technology and information resources to research
issues in ethics.
Write clearly and concisely about ethics using proper
writing mechanics.
Assignment 1: Analysis of a Philosopher’s Views
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
Preparation:
Read “Egoism and Moral Skepticism”s s by James Rachels, located in Chapter 3:
Morality and Self Interest. Discuss his views and provide a valid and logical analysis
and response.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
Analyze James Rachel’s arguments regarding psychological egoism and ethical
egoism.
Provide at least two (2) examples that support the idea of moral skepticism.
Discuss whether or not morality is possible in light of egoism, providing a rationale and
examples to support your position.
Include at least three (3) credible, academic references. (Do not use such open sources
as Wikipedia, About, Ask.)
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch
margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the
professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page
are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Explain the views of the main philosophers and the primary ethical concepts associated
with each of the major ethical theories presented in the course.
Recognize basic ethical theories, such as Divine Command Theory, Relativism,
Utilitarianism, Kantianism, Social Contract Theory, Egoism, and Virtue Ethics.
Demonstrate an understanding of how to examine questions and issues from diverse
ethical perspectives and how these different ethical perspectives can be applied to
evaluate contemporary ethical dilemmas.
Demonstrate recognition of the role and function of moral arguments addressing
traditional and contemporary moral issues.
Present complex ethical ideas, theories, and perspectives fairly, objectively, and
critically.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in ethics.
Write clearly and concisely about ethics using proper writing mechanics.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment