Based on the attached files below read the op ed article and answer the questions in the ope ed questions pdf, it says 150 words a questions but 100 words a question is fine1. What is the message of the Op-Ed? 2. Why do you think the author wrote this? Why are they making this secret information public? 3. Whom do you think the author is writing to? Be more specific than “the public”. 4. What is the “Call to Action”? 5. Do you think that this was timed by the author to distract from the Kavanaugh hearing? 6. Why is this a big deal in our country/government?
op_ed_questions.pdf

op_ed_article.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

New York Times Op-Ed
Answer each of the following questions in 150 words or more.
1. What is the message of the Op-Ed?
2. Why do you think the author wrote this? Why are they making this secret information public?
3. Whom do you think the author is writing to? Be more specific than “the public”.
4. What is the “Call to Action”?
5. Do you think that this was timed by the author to distract from the Kavanaugh hearing?
6. Why is this a big deal in our country/government?
I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the
Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst
inclinations.
Sept. 5, 2018
The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a
senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We
believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to
submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.
President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.
It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that
his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.
The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working
diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.
I would know. I am one of them.
To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its
policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.
But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of
our republic.
You have 3 free articles remaining.
Subscribe to The Times
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr.
Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first
principles that guide his decision making.
Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free
minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them
outright.
In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are
generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.
Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture:
effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.
But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial,
petty and ineffective.
From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at
the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, illinformed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me
recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a
week earlier.
The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides
have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the
West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.
It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what
is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.
The result is a two-track presidency.
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President
Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us
to allied, like-minded nations.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like
Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather
than ridiculed as rivals.
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a
former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further
confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for
its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which
would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do
what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.
The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to
us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.
Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap,
with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.
We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and
our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.
There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made
by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one:
Americans.
The writer is a senior official in the Trump administration.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion).
A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 5, 2018, on Page A23 of the New York edition with the headline: The Quiet Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

Purchase answer to see full
attachment