Assume that, as the compensation professional, you are to present your reasoning, based on theory, for recommending certain compensation strategies. Explain at least two theories and identify how they impact compensation and the work environment.For this assignment you will develop a 3-5 page, APA-formatted paper. As the compensation professional you will be writing the report for the owners of a new organization. In your paper cover the following:Examine two theories that impact compensation.Discuss how each of the theories can motivate employees.Discuss specific types of compensation providing examples on how theory can influence employee performance.Instructions:Write a 3-5 page paper, or about 1500 words, not including the title and reference pages, which are required.Your paper must be properly cited and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Include a formal works cited page. This is an individual paper; however, you should reflect on our discussion forums and incorporate ideas from there, as appropriate.You must support your analysis with at least two scholarly references and can include resources from this course.The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources. You cannot use Wikipedia or any CSU-Global assignment. For this assignment, a credible source is defined as:A scholarly or peer-reviewed journal article.A government-based website or publication.A trade or industry journal article, publication, or website, including those from trade organizations such as SHRM.org and TD.org.The paper must be formatted correctly using APA style.
module_4_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

1/8/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
HRM350 CT Mod 4
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/6293/assignments/121284?module_item_id=298769
1/4
1/8/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Requirements
Content
Critical
Analysis
Ratings
Pts
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Includes all of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Includes some
of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Includes few
of the
required
components,
as specified
in the
assignment.
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Demonstrates
strong or
adequate
knowledge of the
materials about
compensation
and performance
management;
correctly
represents
knowledge from
the readings and
sources.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge about
compensation
and performance
management.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration
of knowledge
about
compensation
and
performance
management.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of
the materials
about
compensation
and
performance
management.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Provides a
strong critical
analysis and
interpretation of
the information
given.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
analysis and
interpretation.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
provide
critical
analysis and
interpretation
of the
information
given.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/6293/assignments/121284?module_item_id=298769
20.0 pts
20.0 pts
10.0 pts
2/4
1/8/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Analysis
Sources /
Examples
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar, and
style.
Ratings
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis.
Pts
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Sources or
examples meet
required criteria
and are well
chosen to
provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Sources or
examples meet
required criteria
but are less‐than
adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Sources or
examples meet
required criteria
but are poorly
chosen to
provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Source or
example
selection
and
integration
of
knowledge
from the
course is
clearly
deficient.
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Project is
clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper essay
format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure; few
errors in
grammar and
spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Project is fairly well
organized and
written, and is in
proper essay
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure;
significant number
of errors in
grammar and
spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Project is
poorly
organized;
does not follow
proper essay
format.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development;
numerous
errors in
grammar and
spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Project is not
organized or
well written,
and is not in
proper essay
format. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable
in terms of
grammar and
spelling.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/6293/assignments/121284?module_item_id=298769
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
3/4
1/8/2019
Module 4: Critical Thinking
Criteria
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
Ratings
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Project contains
proper APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global
Guide to Writing
and APA, with
no more than
one significant
error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Few errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU-Global
Guide to Writing
and APA, with
no more than
two to three
significant
errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Significant
errors in APA
formatting,
according to
the CSUGlobal Guide
to Writing and
APA, with four
to five
significant
errors.
Pts
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Numerous
errors in APA
formatting,
according to
the CSU-Global
Guide to
Writing and
APA, with more
than five
significant
errors.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 90.0
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/6293/assignments/121284?module_item_id=298769
4/4

Purchase answer to see full
attachment