PLEASE SEPARATE ON DIFFERENT WORD DOCUMENTYou must follow the writing standards and formatting that I have attached belowPlease find instructions for both tasks attachedNo Plagiarism at all and excellent writing skills
d7c8804b_3522_44b6_a4dd_9cb36ef80918.png

14919bf9_f94b_46ae_8160_6809a5923ebe.png

69f109b6_f081_400f_963a_f6b11dd0741f.png

bus520_assignment1.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

ASSIGNMENT 1
ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES
AND SOLUTIONS
Due Week 4: 240 points
Leaders address issues and propose solutions. As a leader, you’ll need to
stay on top of events that may facilitate or hinder productivity. You must
create and implement solutions to address these issues.
This assignment exposes you to complex modern organizational
challenges. The solutions you devise should reflect your learning and
research of organizational and individual influences in the workplace.
INSTRUCTIONS
The new CEO has selected your consulting firm to give him/her an analysis
of the organizational efficiency.
Write a double-spaced 2 to 3 page paper in which you will present to the
CEO your findings during your research steps. You must propose strategic
solutions in your paper to include the following:
1) Describe the Organization and the Issue to Resolve
• Provide a brief description of the organization you selected.

Present the organizational issue that adversely affected
productivity and that you, the consultant, will review and
resolve.
2) Analyze Current Corporate Culture
• How has the current corporate culture facilitated the
development of the current issue? Research the organization,
dig into the culture, and analyze how it contributed to this issue.
Hint: Review the mission and vision statements as well as the
corporate website.
3) Identify Areas of Weakness
• What are the organization’s areas of weakness? Use your
research on organizational behavior approaches to corporate
culture, diversity, teamwork, and motivational strategies.
4) Propose Solutions
• What organizational practices would you modify? What
solutions would you recommend to management? As the
consultant you will identify the suggestions and solutions you
would present to the organization’s leadership with regard to
modifying current organizational practices to resolve the issue.
5) References and Citations
• Provide at least 2 quality resources such as the course
textbook, company website, business websites (CNBC,
Bloomberg, etc.), resources from the Strayer Library, and/or
outside sources. Note: Wikipedia and web-based blogs do not
qualify as credible resources.

In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting
another source.
6) Formatting and Writing Standards
• Formatting and writing standards are part of your grade. Align
your formatting to the Strayer Writing Standards.
*Grading for this assignment will be based on the following criteria and evaluation standards:
POINTS: 240
Criteria
1. Describe the
Organization and
the Issue to
Resolve
Weight: 20%
2. Analyze
Current Corporate
Culture
Weight: 20%
3. Identify Areas
of Weakness
Weight 20%
4. Propose
Solutions
Weight 25%
5. Reference
minimums;
Reference quality
ASSIGNMENT 1: ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS
Exemplary
100% – A
Proficient
85% – B
Fair
75% – C
Fully describes the
organization by providing a
relevant and robust but
concise overview of the
company (e.g. when they
were established, what
service(s) or products they
provide, and other relevant
information). Additionally,
the author fully describes the
issue he/she has identified;
what he/she knows about it
and how it has impacted the
company.
Sufficiently describes the
organization and provides
details about the company.
The issue is identified and
the author sufficiently
describes what he/she
knows about it and its
impact on the company.
Partially describes the
organization and provides
some details about the
company, but additional
details would improve the
description. The issue and
its impact on the company
are not clearly articulated.
Does not describe the
organization or provide
details about the company.
The issue and its impact on
the company are not
provided.
Completely describes the
company’s culture by
detailing how the company
positions itself from internal
and external perspectives.
Draws strong, logical
connections about how the
culture did or could have
supported/facilitated the
challenge. Makes direct
connections and supports
points with source material.
Satisfactorily describes
the company culture by
drawing on and
synthesizing corporate
information about the
company. Makes logical
and realistic connections
that are supported by
source material.
Partially describes the
company’s culture. Lacks
details and/or multiple
sources are not utilized to
provide a well-rounded
perspective. Makes loose
connections that were not
supported by sources or
that were not fully
articulated.
The culture is not
described or the company
is not differentiated
completely from others.
Poses unsupported
connections or
connections are not
included.
Completely identifies areas
of weakness and provides
strong details with logical
connections and supporting
source material.
Satisfactorily identifies
areas of weakness and
provides valid details
supported by source
material.
Partially identifies areas of
weakness and makes loose
connections between the
weaknesses and supporting
material.
Does not identify areas of
weakness or does not
provide supporting source
material.
Completely describes
modifications to
organizational practices and
provides solutions with
strong connections and
supporting source material.
Logically details how the
solutions will resolve issue.
Satisfactorily describes
modifications to
organizational practices.
Provides solutions that
make some connections
with supporting source
material to indicate how
the solutions will resolve
the issue.
Partially describes
modifications to
organizational practices and
solutions to resolve the
issues. Lacks supporting
details and source material.
Does not describe
modifications to
organizational practices,
or does not identify
solutions that would
resolve the issue. No
source material is
provided.
Meets or exceeds number of Meets number of
required references; all
required references;
references high quality
some references may be
choices.
poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required
number of references; some
references may be poor
quality choices.
No references provided or
all references poor quality
choices.
Followed all writing
standards.
Met page minimums.
Followed few writing
standards.
Followed few to no writing
standards.
Did not meet page
minimums.
Weight 5%
6. Follows writing
standards;
Meets page
minimums
Weight 10%
Followed most writing
standards.
Met page minimums.
May not have met page
minimums.
Unacceptable
0% – F

Purchase answer to see full
attachment