Kant argues that it is always immoral to lie, can you think of situations where it would be immoral, to tell the truth?Be sure to:address the prompt(s) fully (write a paragraph);respond to one classmate’s posting (say something substantial – add to the discussion!) (your response should be a well-thought-out paragraph); anduse standard English and grammar in all postings.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Wrong Is Always Wrong:
After reading this chapter, you will be able to:
2.1 Analyze Kant’s concept of human dignity and how it relates to reason.
2.2 Articulate Kant’s three statements on the categorical imperative.
2.3 Summarize Kant’s major theories after reading two selected essays.
2.4 Discuss the morality of lying according to Kant.
Kant and the Dignity of All Persons
Reason, which all people have, reveals to us both the equality of all
persons and a necessary respect for the human dignity we all have.
Showing that respect for others as well as for ourselves and
recognizing our duty to do what is right.
These are the aims one of the most influential moral philosophies
Ties morality and rationality together. Rational people are
moral; irrational people are immoral. If you break the rules you
are irrational (and immoral).
The Foundation of Kant’s Ethics
Kant employs a deontological analysis of ethical issues. The useful
neologism, which Kant himself did not use, combines the Greek
word for duty, deon, with logos or science.
Deontological ethics focus on the act itself as opposed to the
moral agent or the consequences of the act when evaluating
A Rule of Logic
Lying, Cheating, Stealing and Killing are all wrong for Kant.
However, they are wrong not based upon the consequences, but because
according to Kant, they violate a rule of logic.
For example, if we all lied all the time, there would be no truth in the world. As
such, truth would be meaningless. Logically, it would not exist.
Kantian Moral Theory
According to Kant our moral duty is knowable by means of our
rationality. Our rationality allows human beings to be conscious of
rules of behavior, which he considers to be both Universal and
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Categorical Imperative – It commands certain conduct
Categorical – it applies instantly to all rational beings
Imperative – a principle on which we ought to act
“Act only on that maxim (reason or motive) whereby you can at the
same time will that it should become a universal law”.
Imagine if everyone acted as you are about to act.
Kant thinks that certain moral rules apply to everyone all the time.
A rule, such as lying is wrong, applies to everyone, and, therefore,
morality commands that we never lie no matter what situation we
find ourselves in.
The beneficial consequences of our action do not justify any action
that violates the categorical imperative.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative (continued)
Kant thinks that certain moral rules apply to everyone all the
A rule such as lying is wrong, applies to everyone, and
therefore morality commands that we never lie no matter
what situation we find ourselves in.
The beneficial consequences of our action do not justify any
action that violates the categorical imperative.
Purchase answer to see full