12 Pages not including title and ref page. APA FormatThesis: I hypothesize that patients between the ages of 18 and 65 that have been diagnosed with Central Sleep Apnea (CSA) could benefit greatly from the remede System in comparison to the alternative treatmentssuch as Positive Pressure Devices (PPD’s) and medication, ultimately decreasing morbiditywhile improving patient compliance and quality of life.c. Review of Literature (Results)i. Comprehensive review and sharing of pertinent published medical literatureii. Contains the raw data and statistical analysis from the resources you researched.Statements made without this…are just statements.iii. Qualify and quantify words used such as reduced, increased, significant, large,remarkable, and important.iv. Demonstrates support of your subtopics and thesisv. Example (minimum of 3 subtopics):1. Subtopic 1: narrative of x# of article supporting this subtopic2. Subtopic 2: narrative of x# of article supporting this subtopic3. Subtopic 3: narrative of x# of article supporting this subtopicvi. Syllabus: this is a review of credible, relevant, and published medical literature related tothe topic and includes the statistical data with which arguments are being made insupport of, and in opposition to, the thesis. The intent is for each student, using theirsubtopics (Tier 2 Heading) for organizational structure, to provide a review of factualdata and demonstrate synthesis of the articles.1. Example: if your topic was on the “Prevention of Childhood diabetes” and thethree subtopics are exercise, nutrition, and education. A way to approachpresenting data would be to have approx. 5 or more articles in support of and inopposition of each subtopic.d. Discussioni. Thoughtfully organized synthesis of medical literature1. Demonstrate relationships among publications (similarities, differences)2. Integration of supporting research3. Lays out your argument for your thesis, subtopics4. Explains and brings relevance to the data presented in the Results section.5. Example:a. Synthesis of how narratives from the subtopics support your thesisii. This is a thoughtful synthesis of the relationships among the research studies cited (inprevious Tier 1 Heading – ROL) in order to further develop the paper an must include aminimum of three subtopics (Tier 2 Heading). It brings meaning and relevance to thedata presented previously. Consider your target audience (fellow clinicians) and gearyour discussion and argument to that group.1. Example: in the ROL, statistical significance of each of the subtopics would beprovided to bring validity to your argument. In the discussion, an explanationwould be given to show how each of the subtopics, collectively, prove argument.LimitationsClearly and succinctly state both the potential limitations of your review and theirimplications for your conclusions. Example: If your topic was new your references or researchmay be limited, how would you expect that to affect your results? Limitations of the research (including the statistical and clinical significance of results, and forms of bias and confounders)that may affect the application of the results.f. Conclusioni. This is the concluding division of the body of the paper and should contain:1. Original summary of findings2. Original discussion of the significance of those findings (particularly for pt care)3. Presentation of practical implications for health care and clinical proactive fromthose findings.ii. Thesis and subtopics are restated and declared if they were proven or supported by yourresourcesiii. A short summary of findingsiv. Discussion of the significance of findingsv. Discussion of the theoretical or practical implications of findingsvi. Recommendations for future studies4. References2. Minimum of 15 resources from relevant and current, peer-reviewed sources from the literature < 8 years old (I Have all 15 I will send them to you)a. Academic journalsb. Databasesc. NOT...magazines, Wikipedia, unpublished works