Please see the two attached documents for detail instructions for what is need to complete help with these assignments.
wk4_tim_8320.docx

wk8_tim_7020.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
Instructions
In a paper, identify and evaluate strategies for crisis management. Your paper should focus on the
information technology perspective in terms of crisis management.
Your paper should include answers to the following questions:






What is technology’s role in managing a crisis situation?
Does it change depending upon the crisis?
Should a manager within the information technology team be in charge of the crisis? Why or why
not?
What plans and procedures should be in place regarding information technology in times of
crisis?
How can organizations ensure the crisis plan will be effective BEFORE a crisis actually occurs?
What does the current research say about the role of information technology in a crisis?
Support your paper with a minimum of five recent (within the past five years) scholarly resources. In
addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may
be included.
Length: 5-7 pages not including titles and reference pages
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in
the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should
reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
INSTRUCTIONS
Throughout the course, you have been learning about different areas of research in databases and
business intelligence. Your task for this week is to recreate an experiment conducted in a recent
research paper. Select a study to recreate which has been published in the last two years. Be
sure to select a study that is repeatable using a provided dataset.
Once you have selected an interesting research paper, address the following:








Describe the issue addressed. Indicate why is it important and if this is an agreed-upon
concern.
Describe what was accomplished by the study and what was not achieved.
Describe the methodology utilized in conducting the study. Determine if it was
appropriate and justify your response.
Describe the study results and the contribution it made to the body of knowledge, if any.
Describe possible extensions to the research, if any. In what ways can the study be
enhanced or modified to provide additional value? Discuss any limitations or
assumptions held within the study and how they can be addressed.
Present the study’s experiment that will be reproduced. Be sure to outline the setup and
resources utilized.
Determine how you will reproduce the experiment. Explain how your experiment differs
from the original and in what ways were they the same. How do your results compare
with the original results, and what conclusions can be drawn with the additional data
provided by your experiment?
Finally, reproduce the experiment and document the setup, procedure, and results. Create
any tables, graphs, raw results, or aggregate reports that would allow for direct
comparison with the original study.
Support your paper with scholarly and industry resources. In addition to these specified
resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.
There should be a total of at least 10 external scholarly references.
Length: 10 pages
Your assignment should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in
the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic.
Criteria
Achievement
Level 1
(full points)
Criterion
included and
meets all
requirement
s
Achievement
Level 2
(partial points):
Criterion
included, not
fully meeting
requirements
Achievement
Level 3
(partial points):
Criterion
included,
minimally
meets
requirements
Achievement
Level 4
(no points):
Criterion not
included
Total
Point
s
Criterion
1,
3 points:
Writing
Quality
Criterion
2,
1 point:
Reference
s
Criterion
3,
4 points:
Properly
Addressed
Issues
Only very
minor
problems
with
text/grammar
(3)
Proper
amount of
references
used and no
issues with
formatting
(1)
All items
properly
addressed
and no
significant
unanswered
questions
about
direction or
process used
(4)
Some issues
with
Moderate issues
text/grammar but
with
nothing
text/grammar (1)
significant (2)
Significant
problems with
text/grammar (0)
Minor issues at
missing
references or
minor problems
with formatting
(.75)
Attempt at
adding
references, but
improperly used
when attempt
was made (.5)
No References
used (0)
Minor issues
with work’s
content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(3)
Moderate issues
with work’s
content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(2)
Significant
issues with
work’s content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(0)
Total
Points
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***

Purchase answer to see full
attachment