Please see the attached instruction for what’s need for the paper and power-point. For the Wk7 paper need to create Research Proposal. Please read instructions for the power-point.
wk7_tim_7020.docx

wk3_tim_8320.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
INSTRUCTIONS
Create a Research Proposal; the proposal must focus on a topic within the database and
knowledge management domain. Your proposal must be in APA format, contain at least ten
scholarly peer-reviewed resources academic references, and be of the quality expected of
doctoral-level work. The proposal may be an extension of a previous submission in the course.
This proposal should intrigue your audience and be research worthy. It could include a
completely new topic derived from the readings and research. If in doubt, please share your idea
with your professor and request feedback. Write a ten-page research proposal (not including the
title page, table of contents, and reference list) that contains the elements listed below:








Title Page
o Title: The title of your work should be concise and describe what your research
will entail.
o Student Name
o Course Name and ID
o University
o Date
Table of Contents
Background
o This section should provide enough information so that the reader understands the
general context, settings, and basis for the proposed research. A non-expert may
read the proposal, so ensure there is sufficient framing and discussion of the
underlying concepts.
Problem Statement
o This section should focus on the presentation of a literature-supported open
research question or problem that must be addressed. Additional areas should
include detailed discussions of its scope, nature, what the problem is, how it
developed or evolved into a problem, why it is a problem, and a brief discussion
as to the other works that establish it as a problem within the literature.
Goal
o This section provides a concise definition of the goal of the study, what it will
accomplish, and how it will be measured. That is, how you will define success
and failure of the study (if applicable)?
Relevance and Significance
o This section provides additional support for the problem statement and goal by
discussing why the problem exists, who is affected by it, and the impact of the
problem. Additionally, discuss the study’s significance and how its outcomes will
address the stated problem.
Literature Review
o This section will focus on clearly identifying the major areas that the research will
focus on to establish a foundation of the study within the body of knowledge. The
presentation of literature is an expansion of an annotated bibliography that
justifies the problem, hypothesis, impact, and significance of the study.
Approach
o A detailed explanation of how the study will be undertaken and how the goal will
be achieved. This should take the form of a discussion of the methodology used,

each step and milestone, with an explanation of each. Ensure that the approach is
supported by the literature, as it cannot be based solely on opinion or experience.
References
Support your paper with scholarly and industry resources. In addition to these specified
resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including seminal articles, may be included.
There should be a total of at least ten external scholarly references.
Length: 10 pages, not including title, table of contents, and reference pages
Resources: A minimum of 10 scholarly resources.
Your research proposal should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts
presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic.
Your response should reflect scholarly writing and APA standards. Be sure to adhere to
Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Upload your document and click the Submit to Dropbox button.
Your presentation should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts
presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic.
Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
Criteria
Criterion
1,
3 points:
Writing
Quality
Criterion
2,
1 point:
Reference
s
Achievement
Achievement
Achievement
Level 1
Level 3
Level 2
(full points)
(partial points):
(partial points):
Criterion
Criterion
Criterion
included and
included,
included, not
meets all
minimally
fully meeting
requirement
meets
requirements
s
requirements
Only very
Some issues
minor
with
Moderate issues
problems
text/grammar but
with
with
nothing
text/grammar (1)
text/grammar
significant (2)
(3)
Proper
Minor issues at
Attempt at
amount of
missing
adding
references
references or
references, but
used and no
minor problems improperly used
issues with
with formatting
when attempt
formatting
(.75)
was made (.5)
(1)
Achievement
Level 4
(no points):
Criterion not
included
Significant
problems with
text/grammar (0)
No References
used (0)
Total
Point
s
Criterion
3,
4 points:
Properly
Addressed
Issues
All items
properly
addressed
and no
significant
unanswered
questions
about
direction or
process used
(4)
Minor issues
with work’s
content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(3)
Moderate issues
with work’s
content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(2)
Total
Points
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
Significant
issues with
work’s content
including
recommendation
s or reasoning
(0)
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***
Instructions
Employees were impressed with the information you provided during the last staff meeting; your
supervisor has asked for you to return to the next board meeting as senior leadership would like
additional information on data recovery strategies. For this activity, develop a PowerPoint presentation
that evaluates and critiques system and data recovery strategies as discussed in your readings from both
the natural disaster standpoint as well as the cyber-attack standpoint.
This presentation should include the following:




An evaluation of at least three (3) system and data recovery strategies.
Your critique of the pros and cons of each strategy.
An analysis of the differences in approach to data recovery between natural disaster and cyberattack situations.
Support with local or national incidents as examples to illustrate your points.
Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as “speaker notes” for each slide.
The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists.
Support your presentation with at least five (5) scholarly resources. In addition to these specified
resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.
Length: 12-15 slides (with a separate reference slide)
Notes Length: 200-350 words for each slide
Be sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases with references in APA format and style
where appropriate. Save the file as PPT with the correct course code information.
Upload your presentation and click the Submit to Dropbox button.
*** Please use “Scholarly references vice Book references ***

Purchase answer to see full
attachment